In 2025, ConnectEd organized its first nonprofit PhD Incubator to support people preparing to apply for doctoral study. A sustained mentoring initiative for the next stage of academic development.

From September 2025 through January 2026, more than twenty faculty members, postdoctoral researchers, and doctoral students worked with prospective applicants through a webinar series, small-group workshops, application-writing feedback, and mentor interviews.

The initiative grew out of ConnectEd’s wider community work. Its aim was to lower the communication and information barriers that often stand between strong applicants and the labs they hope to join.

FocusDoctoral preparation and academic mentorship
ParticipantsProspective PhD applicants
Mentors20+ faculty members, postdocs, and doctoral students
DurationSeptember 2025 – January 2026

The community behind the incubator

Three formats of support

Application Webinars

A monthly series on the core stages of a PhD application, each led by one or two mentors. Sessions ran 60–90 minutes, combining a focused talk with Q&A, and some included breakout rooms, peer review, or practice exercises. Recordings remained available to participants.

Small-Group Workshops

Groups of up to five participants, organized by field and target country, met with a mentor during the application season. Participants submitted questions or drafts in advance and received live feedback on statements, strategy, and field-specific questions.

Mentor Interviews

Short recorded conversations with mentors on topics such as interviews, contacting prospective advisors, the value of a PhD, doctoral life in North America, and the skills each research area looks for. Mentors reviewed every interview before it was shared.

The webinar series

Eight sessions followed the application calendar, from early planning to final decisions. Sessions were held on Zoom with a capped audience so that everyone had time to interact with mentors, and priority went to incubator participants and ConnectEd volunteers. Dates are listed in U.S. Eastern Time where confirmed; other sessions are shown by their planned month.

SessionFocusTiming
01 · Planning & Time ManagementBuilding a realistic application timeline.September 2025
02 · The Academic CVPresenting research experience clearly.September 2025
03 · Contacting Faculty & Recommendation LettersThe process of reaching out to prospective advisors and securing recommendations, mentors’ own experiences, and breakout-room Q&A.
Led by doctoral students in engineering education at Ohio State and in education at UC Irvine.
September 27, 2025
04 · The Statement of PurposeHow to approach and structure a statement of purpose, what makes one effective, and live Q&A.
Led by a Columbia University doctoral researcher in adult learning and leadership, and a Penn State doctoral candidate in language education.
October 4, 2025
05 · Writing a Research ProposalWhat a research proposal is for, how to write one, common difficulties, and a live exercise in designing research questions and methods.
Led by an Illinois State University assistant professor in literacy education, with a doctoral student in educational technology.
October 4, 2025
06 · A Faculty PerspectiveWhat makes a strong candidate.November 2025
07 · Interview PreparationCommon questions and mock interview practice.December 2025
08 · Choosing Offers & FellowshipsHow to compare doctoral offers, how to apply for scholarships, and breakout-room Q&A.
Led by a doctoral student in biomedical sciences at UT Southwestern Medical Center.
January 24, 2026

Who mentored

Their research spans education and literacy, learning sciences, educational technology, language education, engineering education, linguistics, statistics and biostatistics, chemical and environmental engineering, electrical engineering, industrial engineering, computer science, biomedical sciences, clinical and preventive medicine, public health, cognitive science, gerontology, business and marketing, and management science.

Mentors came from institutions including Harvard University, Columbia University, the University of Oxford, UCLA, USC, Peking University, Mayo Clinic, and HKUST.

Mentors are listed below by the names they chose to use publicly. Roles are as of the 2025–26 application cycle.

Faculty

Researchers & Clinicians

Doctoral Students & Graduates

What participants received

For mentors

The incubator was designed to fit around the schedules of working researchers. Its format offers a model for how faculty and doctoral students can take part in future editions.

How mentors took part

What mentors received

Why a sustained format matters to our approach

The incubator was designed to give participants time to ask questions, reflect on their goals, and develop their application materials with feedback.

It complemented research training by focusing on the transition toward doctoral study and participation in academic communities.

Operating as a nonprofit

Participants paid a modest registration fee to keep the incubator sustainable. The fee went only to mentor honoraria and core operating costs, such as technology, event coordination, and administration. Outreach relied on low-cost channels, including our own social media and nonprofit partners.

Looking ahead

The 2025 initiative is presented here as part of our past community work. Future editions, eligibility, and participation arrangements will be announced separately when confirmed.